Larry James Bradley v. Florida
AdministrativeLaw ERISA Privacy
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant civil rights statutes and constitutional provisions
No question identified. : FEDERAL QUESTION (1) WHETHER. PETITIONER IS PROPERLY DETAINED AS AN ENEMY COMBATANT wiTHouT PRESIDENTIAL | AUTHORITY To So So? @) WHETHER FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 8775.082(4) VIOLATES THE CSUSPENSTONE CLAUSE) ARTICLE 189 el. L | OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ASAPPLIED TO | PETLTLONER. ? (3) WHETHER FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 8715.082C9) VIOLATES THE EQUAL PROTECTION GUARANTEES OF THE | UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AS~APPLIEN TO PETITIONER 7? G.e., THE CITIZENSHIP CLAUSE” U-S.C.AXdy § 1 cl.4) (4) WHETHER. FLORIDA STATUTE & 715.082 (9) VIOLATES THE COMMERCECLAUSE PROVISTONS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AS-APPLIED TO PETITIONER. ? | (5) WHETHER FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION §775.082(9). VIOLATES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AS-APPLIED TO PETITIONER? (lb) WHETHER FLORIDA STATUTE SECTION 8775.082 (9) VIOLATES ARTICLE 3Cd) OF THE FIRST GENEVA CONVENTION? ASAPPLIED TO PETITIONER ? (7). WHETHER RESPONDENT(s) ARE ENTITLED To | TMMUNITY PURSUANT TO THE FOREIGN SovEREIGN © IMMUNITY ACT 28 US.C. § [boy ? | ()