No. 22-6169
Shane Alan Nault v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment fourth-amendment investigatory-stop rodriguez-standard rodriguez-v-united-states search-and-seizure seizure-scope terry-stop traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether seizing an individual seated in a parked car in a private parking lot should be analyzed in the context of a 'traffic stop' under Rodriguez, or an 'investigatory stop' under Terry, for purposes of defining the proper scope of the seizure's mission
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW i, Whether seizing an individual seated in a parked car in a private parking lot should be analyzed in the context of a “traffic stop” under Rodriguez, or an “investigatory stop” under Terry, for purposes of defining the proper scope of the seizure’s mission. 2
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 29, 2022)
Attorneys
Shane Alan Nault
Elizabeth Tipton Musick — Musick & Tierney Law, PLLC, Petitioner
Elizabeth Tipton Musick — Musick & Tierney Law, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent