Andrea Peterson v. HVM L.L.C., et al.
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether a person(s) with a handicap or disability are protected by the Due Process Clause
QUESTIONS PRESENTED e Whether a person(s), who lacks the financial resources to hire an attorney, and | because of their handicap, disability cannot comply with a court rule(s), are | protected by the guarantee of the Due Process Clause of the 14 Constitutional | Amendment, e Whether, “Does the Constitutional Amendments guarantees also apply to a black ! woman, Plaintiff... And, is pursuant to the Constitutional Amendments of the | United States of America, Plaintiff entitled to, (1) Due Process, and to (2) Equal Protection of the Law...” | Pet‘r Motion for Reconsideration (117) pp. 1 to 4. e Whether the decision of the U.S. District Court of New Jersey, to grant Respondent Motion for Summary Judgement, when all Petitioner Discovery Request were not granted and or denied, will reset precedence established in Anderson v. Liberty, Inc., 477 US 242 (1986), Celotex Corp. V. Catrett 477 US 317 (1986), and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56, will cause significant conflict with other Circuits, and the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Further, whether the non-granting/denial of Discovery is a violation of the Due Process Clause of the 14 Constitutional Amendment. 1