No. 22-6230

Derrick A. Edwards v. K. King, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-12-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights compelling-interest constitutional-rights criminal-conviction evidence-challenge free-exercise judicial-review least-restrictive-means procedural-limitations RLUIPA substantial-burden substantive-due-process
Key Terms:
Arbitration Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether RLUIPA requires the respondent to show that it lacks other means of achieving its desired goal without imposing a substantial burden on the petitioner's exercise of religion

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . iF Whether 43 U.S.C, Seefian 20a ct sez. (RLUIPAS FeLuires the. Kesforden+ to Show thet it lacks | ather means af achievina 4s desired, Saal a Without imhoind a gubstantial burded ad : | HiMtionecrs exercise. oF telisun 2 } . | de AEs & \ess (eshrictive. means 1S availab le for the. Resandet ts achieve tts deal» does the Restondeuk rave @ dudd ts ase it < . | 7 | Be uthodher 16.0. Section 9000 ef set (RLUWP AS Powtemk\cles a Lacused IN turA and Ceduives the ResPondenl 4 Snow Hat He ComPellina (1 nteres toa 14 antisCied Hugh atPlication of the Challensed Vuus te Ho Pelibone? whose Sincere 2 | . evercisedeliaron 19 bend Substantralls burdened $ . __

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-04
Waiver of right of respondents K. King, et al. to respond filed.
2022-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 5, 2023)

Attorneys

Derrick A. Edwards
Derrick A. Edwards — Petitioner
Derrick A. Edwards — Petitioner
K. King, et al.
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent