Derrick A. Edwards v. K. King, et al.
Arbitration Securities
Whether RLUIPA requires the respondent to show that it lacks other means of achieving its desired goal without imposing a substantial burden on the petitioner's exercise of religion
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . iF Whether 43 U.S.C, Seefian 20a ct sez. (RLUIPAS FeLuires the. Kesforden+ to Show thet it lacks | ather means af achievina 4s desired, Saal a Without imhoind a gubstantial burded ad : | HiMtionecrs exercise. oF telisun 2 } . | de AEs & \ess (eshrictive. means 1S availab le for the. Resandet ts achieve tts deal» does the Restondeuk rave @ dudd ts ase it < . | 7 | Be uthodher 16.0. Section 9000 ef set (RLUWP AS Powtemk\cles a Lacused IN turA and Ceduives the ResPondenl 4 Snow Hat He ComPellina (1 nteres toa 14 antisCied Hugh atPlication of the Challensed Vuus te Ho Pelibone? whose Sincere 2 | . evercisedeliaron 19 bend Substantralls burdened $ . __