No. 22-6441

James D. Dayvault v. Kansas

Lower Court: Kansas
Docketed: 2023-01-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights consensual-encounter custody detention due-process family-law fourth-amendment law-enforcement photography reasonable-person reasonable-person-standard seizure
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Kansas Court of Appeals err when it affirmed the trial court's denying custody for the purposes of Ananda, and did the court err by applying the law incorrectly?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : T. Did the Kansas Court of Doneals ecc when it afficmed the AL Uidhen detecnsing custody Soe the pucpases af Znanda, des the couck ere by applying the law decently? would a reasonable pecson fect free do tecminate an encounter —C.Does_phatageaphy of childaen in public justify peobable @ | LST OF PARTIES pW RELATED CASES State Dayvau de 1T=CR= 3024, Ergtrenth Sdlicial Dickict Staten Dayras, ale 122,784, Kansas Cas ck of Appcale,

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-18
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2022-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 2, 2023)

Attorneys

James Dayvault
James Dayvault — Petitioner
James Dayvault — Petitioner
Kansas
Dwight Rlyn CarswellKansas Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Dwight Rlyn CarswellKansas Attorney General's Office, Respondent