No. 22-6536
Antoine D. Jackson v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-history due-process safety-valve sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the word 'and' in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) should be interpreted in the disjunctive or conjunctive
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) Whether this Court should resolve a Circuit split and decide if the word “and” in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) should be interpreted in the disjunctive or conjunctive. ii
Docket Entries
2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2023-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-15
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 15, 2023.
2023-02-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 13, 2023 to March 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Antoine D. Jackson
Christopher J. Nathan — Federal Public Defender Office - Iowa, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent