| 22-6076 |
Joseph Rauber v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (3)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing drug-offenses mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing-statute statutory-interpretation |
Whether 'and' means 'and' for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) |
| 22-6391 |
Nonami Palomares v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3)IFP |
criminal-history drug-crimes drug-offense federal-sentencing mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether a defendant is ineligible for relief from a mandatory minimum sentence if her criminal history runs afoul of any one of the disqualifying crit… |
| 22-6536 |
Antoine D. Jackson v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-history due-process safety-valve sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction statutory-interpretation |
Whether the word 'and' in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) should be interpreted in the disjunctive or conjunctive |
| 22-6803 |
Mario C. Thomas v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
criminal-history criminal-history-points criminal-procedure federal-sentencing mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. §3553(f)(1) means 'and' or 'or' |
| 22-7059 |
Aaron M. Haynes v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-history-points criminal-justice federal-sentencing first-step-act mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing-guidelines sentencing-reform statutory-interpretation |
Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) means 'and' or 'or' |
| 22-7436 |
Chad Robert Kolkman v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-history criminal-sentencing legal-interpretation mandatory-minimum sentencing statutory-construction statutory-interpretation statutory-text |
Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. §3553(f)(1) means 'and' consistent with the ordinary meaning of the word, so that the person remains eligible unless th… |
| 22-7650 |
Nolan Washington v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-procedure mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation supreme-court |
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in its interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) |
| 22-7702 |
Antonio Montero v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-3553(f) criminal-history criminal-procedure federal-sentencing safety-valve sentence-reduction sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
whether-the-trial-judge-must-find-montero-violated-all-conditions-to-be-eligible-for-sentence-reduction |
| 22-7709 |
Ashley Latreece Thackerson v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-history first-step-act safety-valve sentencing sentencing-relief statutory-interpretation |
Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals err by finding that Petitioner did not qualify for safety valve relief under the First Step Act 18 U.S.C. § 355… |
| 22-7756 |
Andre Zeno v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-history criminal-history-points criminal-procedure safety-valve sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation statutory-minimum |
Whether the 'and' in § 3553(f)(1) means 'and' or 'or' |
| 22-7807 |
Chayna Holguin v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
criminal-history federal-sentencing first-step-act rule-of-lenity safety-valve sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) means 'and' or 'or' for determining eligibility for the 'safety valve' provision |
| 22-828 |
Roger E. Pace v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
circuit-split criminal-history federal-sentencing mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) means 'and' or 'or' for safety-valve relief from mandatory-minimum sentences |
| 23-377 |
Chris Dutra, et al. v. Kim Jackson |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
circuit-court-precedent clearly-established-law excessive-force fourth-amendment ninth-circuit police-conduct qualified-immunity supreme-court-precedent |
Whether this Court's precedents are the only source of clearly established law for purposes of qualified immunity |
| 23-46 |
United States v. Cassity Danielle Jones |
Fourth Circuit |
GVR |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
criminal-history criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines safety-valve sentencing sentencing-relief statutory-interpretation |
Whether a defendant must meet certain criminal history criteria to qualify for 'safety-valve' sentencing relief under 18 U.S.C. 3553(f)(1) |
| 23-463 |
Elizabeth Brokamp v. Letitia James, Attorney General of New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split content-based content-based-regulation evidence first-amendment intermediate-scrutiny licensing-scheme motion-to-dismiss talk-therapy |
Whether a New York law requiring speakers to obtain a license before offering talk therapy pertaining to 'disabilit[ies], problem[s], or disorder[s] o… |
| 23-514 |
Kim Jackson v. Chris Dutra, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act constitutional-law due-process judicial-system qualified-immunity standing stare-decisis |
Whether the Court should reverse or recalibrate the doctrine of qualified immunity |
| 23-5149 |
Javier Escalera, Jr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-history fifth-circuit mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether a defendant is ineligible for relief from a mandatory minimum sentence if his criminal history runs afoul of any one of the disqualifying crit… |
| 23-524 |
American Forest Resource Council, et al. v. United States, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
antiquities-act conservation-reserves land-management national-monument o&c-act presidential-power sustained-yield timber-production |
Whether the President can use an Antiquities-Act-Proclamation to override Congress's plain-text-in-the-O&C-Act to repurpose vast-swaths-of-O&C-timberl… |
| 23-525 |
Murphy Company, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
antiquities-act federal-land-management federal-lands land-use-restrictions national-monument national-monuments oregon-and-california-railroad-and-coos-bay-wagon- presidential-authority presidential-power statutory-interpretation sustained-yield-timber-production |
Whether the Antiquities Act authorizes the President to declare federal lands part of a national monument where a separate federal statute reserves th… |
| 23-5304 |
Jaquantious Hutchison v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
criminal-history federal-sentencing mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction statutory-interpretation |
Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) is conjunctive or disjunctive |
| 23-551 |
GMS Mine Repair v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
|
administrative-law auer-deference chevron-deference chevron-doctrine circuit-court-conflict civil-procedure judicial-review regulatory-interpretation statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Court should overrule Kisor or clarify that the 'traditional tools' of construction must be used to dispel ambiguity in a regulation, rath… |
| 23-555 |
Louis A. Wilson v. United States |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
|
18-usc-3582 circuit-split concepcion-v-united-states extraordinary-and-compelling-reasons extraordinary-reasons habeas habeas-corpus non-retroactive-law sentencing-commission sentencing-reduction u-s-sentencing-commission |
Can non-retroactive changes in the law constitute 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' authorizing a district court to reduce a prisoner's sentence … |
| 23-5604 |
Ernesto Ordunez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
career-offender controlled-substance crime-of-violence elements-clause preservation-of-error prior-conviction sentencing sentencing-enhancement |
Whether an objection that a prior conviction is not a crime of violence and a district court's subsequent analysis of whether it meets the elements cl… |
| 23-5691 |
Ricardo Garcia, Jr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (3)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-history due-process mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether a defendant is ineligible for relief from a mandatory minimum sentence if his criminal history runs afoul of any one of the disqualifying crit… |
| 23-5712 |
Gerald Vaughn Gwen v. Kris Mayes, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (3)IFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights direct-review due-process evidentiary-hearing fair-trial habeas-corpus judicial-review procedural-fairness writ-of-appeal |
Whether the petitioner was denied due process and a fair trial due to the state court's failure to hold an evidentiary hearing on his claim of actual … |
| 23-5798 |
Edgar Eugene Oliver v. Florida Commission on Offender Review |
Florida |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process judicial-discretion judicial-review offender-review separation-of-powers state-agency-power supreme-court-authority |
Does the Florida Commission on Offender Review have the freedom to disobey the United States Supreme Court, the Constitution of the United States, the… |
| 23-5883 |
Shardaye Jeacole Malik Bey v. Ohio |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-1443 appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge constitutional-rights court-fees criminal-procedure criminal-removal due-process filing-fees in-forma-pauperis |
Whether filing fees are required for removal of a criminal action under 28 U.S.C. § 1443 |
| 23-5924 |
Festus Okwudili Ohan v. American Medical Association, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process false-imprisonment federal-crime genocide human-rights international-law judicial-procedure standing whistleblower-protection |
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims for lack of standing and due process violations |
| 23-6029 |
Brianna Irene Bustam v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
criminal-history drug-offenses first-step-act rule-of-lenity safety-valve sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) means 'and' or 'or' for determining eligibility for the 'safety valve' provision |
| 23-6056 |
Talthia Sorbel v. South Dakota, ex rel. South Dakota Department of Social Services, et al. |
South Dakota |
Denied |
Relisted (3)IFP |
adoption civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-admission family judicial-review standing |
Whether the lower court erred in denying the petitioner's request to present new evidence in the case |
| 23-6089 |
Christopher Lenard Blockson v. Ronald Oliver, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus judicial-misconduct judicial-review prosecutorial-misconduct standing |
What is the proper course of action when a court ignores the record on appeal and engages in fraud on the court? |
| 23-6288 |
Carlos Velasquez v. Robert Baldock, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights court-procedure fed-r-civ-p-59 fed-r-civ-p-60(d) fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court judicial-fraud judicial-immunity judicial-malpractice new-trial-timing rule-60 |
Will the Supreme Court of the United States reject Political-Fraud,fraud-and-false-statements-in-official-transactions,when-expressed-by-political-aut… |
| 23-6337 |
Mahfooz Ahmad v. Colin Day, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2284 arbitration-agreement civil-rights constitutional-rights district-court district-court-composition federal-arbitration-act federal-law-challenge ninth-amendment seventh-amendment |
What does 28 U.S. Code § 2284 mandate regarding the composition of a district court when an action challenges the constitutionality of a federal law? |
| 23-636 |
Atif Ahmad Rafay v. Eric Jackson |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
5th-amendment civil-rights due-process false-confession false-confessions habeas-corpus police-coercion police-misconduct undercover-operation wrongful-conviction wrongful-convictions |
Should this Court summarily reverse the Ninth Circuit for failing to address petitioner's preserved claim that his conviction was premised on a confes… |
| 23-6490 |
Johnny Patterson v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process florida-constitution judgment-of-acquittal procedural-due-process |
Did the court violate Petitioner Johnny Patterson procedural due process rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments under the U.S. Constitution and Arti… |
| 23-6491 |
Peyton John Wesley Hopson v. Deborah S. Hunt |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-good-cause certificate-of-good-faith circuit-court counsel-appointment district-court due-process jurisdiction right-to-counsel sixth-amendment sixth-circuit |
Did the Sixth Circuit lose jurisdiction to proceed to review where the Sixth Circuit failed to comply with the Sixth Amendment requirement to appoint … |
| 23-6504 |
Tormu E. Prall v. Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
cause-and-prejudice constitutional-error denial-of-counsel due-process habeas-corpus inequitable judicial-review lower-federal-courts rule-60(b) rule-60b |
Is it a grievous wrong when the lower federal courts demonstrably misread and reshape a habeas-corpus-claim? |
| 23-6507 |
In Re Peter Alan Hearn |
|
Denied |
IFP |
2nd-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing takings |
Whether the government's categorical ban on the possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens in their homes for self-defense violates the Second Ame… |
| 23-6512 |
Douglas Wayne Sokell v. David Pedro, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-punishment due-process eighth-amendment habeas-corpus judicial-review life-sentence prisoner-detention recidivism sentencing three-strikes-law |
Was it constitutional to be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole or release, using recidivism (3 strikes) as a main fact, whe… |
| 23-6513 |
Michael Mogan v. Sacks, Ricketts & Case LLP, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
anti-slapp-statute civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-procedure magistrate-judge magistrate-jurisdiction recusal rule-11-sanctions standing |
Did the Ninth Circuit erroneously fail to recognize that 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) precludes the parties from selecting a magistrate judge |
| 23-6515 |
John Edward Hall v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
burden-of-proof death-penalty due-process federal-habeas standard-of-review state-court |
Whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) (28 U.S.C. 2254(d)) governing federal habeas review of state court decisions… |
| 23-6516 |
Samuel T. Whatley, et al. v. City of North Charleston, South Carolina, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process election-interference federal-jurisdiction freedom-of-information governmental-immunity search-and-seizure transparency treason |
Are intergovernmental agencies immune to federal law prosecutions? |
| 23-6518 |
Anthony Bailey v. Nevada Parole Board, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment civil-rights digital-privacy due-process search-and-seizure standing |
Whether the government's warrantless search and seizure of a person's private digital data violates the Fourth Amendment |
| 23-652 |
Chadwick Dotson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections v. Berman Justus, Jr. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstance federal-rule-of-civil-procedure-60(b)(6) habeas habeas-corpus mental-illness statute-of-limitations |
Whether a habeas petitioner can show that a mental illness constitutes an 'extraordinary circumstance' that warrants reopening a final judgment under … |
| 23-6522 |
Autley I. Salahuddin, II v. Scott Wilkes, Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence direct-appeal exculpatory-evidence habeas-corpus habeas-petition jury-review miscarriage-of-justice new-evidence prerequisites scientific-evidence |
Whether the filing of a direct appeal is a prerequisite to the filing of a habeas petition? |
| 23-6529 |
In Re Raymond Ramirez |
|
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment actual-innocence constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus newly-discovered-evidence scientific-evidence successive-petition |
Whether the court of appeals clearly abused its discretion and deprived the Petitioner of his constitutional rights to Due Process under the 14th Amen… |
| 23-6537 |
Gregory Steshenko v. Foothill-De Anza Community College District, et al. |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
ostensibly justified by business necessity violated the constitutional equal-protection business-necessity civil-rights constitutional-law discrimination due-process equal-protection public-education public-interest standing |
Whether permission of discrimination in public education against the protected classes |
| 23-6538 |
Ye-Ying Cen v. Oliver Wilfred Cass |
Minnesota |
Denied |
IFP |
alimony-tax-law cognitive-impairments due-process fairness fiduciary-duty guardian-ad-litem legal-ethics procedural-fairness spousal-support |
Informed-consent-breach-of-fiduciary-duty |
| 23-6561 |
Lawrence Edward Thompson v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction standing |
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions |
| 23-6564 |
Jerome M. Teats v. Brandon Watwood, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
collateral-proceeding collateral-review criminal-procedure due-process exhaustion-doctrine exhaustion-rule habeas-corpus martinez-rule martinez-v-ryan state-procedural-framework tennessee |
Did the decision in Martinez v Ryan require claims to be raised beyond the initial collateral proceeding for exhaustion purposes in Tennessee and othe… |
| 23-6578 |
Jeffrey Ray Sundwall v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-liberties constitutional-rights criminal-post-conviction due-process final-judgment habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-procedure precedential-effect statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation |
Whether a procedural declaration that has never been construed for precedential effect can be considered a final judgment that triggers the one-year s… |
| 23-6582 |
Joseph Emerson v. United States District Court, et al. |
Ohio |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights court-corruption defamation due-process employment-discrimination extraordinary-writ favoritism interstate-dispute judicial-misconduct nepotism standing |
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the dismissal of his cases by the Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Sharon Kennedy, who… |
| 23-6583 |
Muhammad Khan v. SAP Labs, LLC |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
9th-circuit appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment judicial-review notice-of-appeal personal-property special-needs time-limitation unreasonable-searches-and-seizures warrantless-seizure |
Whether the government's warrantless seizure and indefinite retention of a person's personal property, without any showing of exigent circumstances or… |
| 23-6598 |
Shuaib A. Haji Mohamed v. Jay Forshey, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-claim constitutional-rights discretionary-review federal-jurisdiction federal-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-default state-review |
Has a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus made a substantial showing that his petition should have proceeded further where the procedural def… |
| 23-660 |
Grupo Unidos por el Canal, S.A., et al. v. Autoridad del Canal de Panama |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
|
arbitration arbitrator-impartiality disclosure disclosure-requirements evident-partiality federal-arbitration-act reasonable-impression-of-partiality vacatur |
What is the standard for determining whether an arbitrator's failure to disclose constitutes evident partiality justifying vacatur of the arbitral awa… |
| 23-6603 |
Johnnie Demond Jackson v. Kevin R. Sproul, Sheriff, Dougherty County, Georgia, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-rights confinement constitutional-law due-process federal-jurisdiction interference jurisdiction retaliation summary-judgment |
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the defendants' actions, which allegedly caused him more than 30 minutes of delay in r… |
| 23-6617 |
Michael J. Harvey v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
amendment-standards civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims constitutional-rights de-novo-review due-process free-speech judicial-review medical-assistance standing |
Did the DC apply de novo review to A.'s Complaint? |
| 23-6651 |
Falastin Martin v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction government-accountability judicial-review legal-immunity sovereign-immunity whistleblower-protection |
Will the courts recognize that individuals that work for the U.S. Government are not above U.S. law? |
| 23-6653 |
Mark Marvin v. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure first-amendment free-speech habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance mandamus standing |
Whether petitioner has standing to file a habeas and mandamus petition |
| 23-6655 |
Ralph Hall v. Anthony J. Annucci, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-action constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment federal-law habeas-corpus intellectual-disability judicial-review legal-procedure |
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment prohibits the execution of a prisoner who has been found to be intellectual… |
| 23-666 |
James T. Cunningham v. United States |
Armed Forces |
Denied |
|
court-martial criminal-procedure due-process military-justice non-unanimous-verdict prejudice-test sentencing unanimous-verdict victim-impact-statement |
Whether Senior Airman James T. Cunningham was entitled to a unanimous verdict in his court-martial when the Government convicted him of murder—a serio… |
| 23-6660 |
Douglas Manning v. New Jersey |
New Jersey |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process free-speech judicial-review jurisdiction legal-relief procedural-due-process standing |
Question not identified |
| 23-6728 |
In Re Kimberlee Pitawanakwat |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction general-crimes-act indian-rights major-crimes-act stare-decisis supremacy-clause treaty-interpretation treaty-of-fort-laramie |
Does it violate the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution to subject Indians to stand federal trial… |
| 23-674 |
Rafael Hernández-Montañez v. Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
bankruptcy civil-procedure financial-crisis financial-oversight-and-management-board judicial-jurisdiction municipal-bankruptcy promesa promesa-act puerto-rico puerto-rico-debt territorial-instrumentality territorial-oversight |
Whether an action to enforce the provisions of Titles I and II of PROMESA may be brought before the judge appointed by the Chief Justice to preside on… |
| 23-6766 |
Zavian Munize Jordan v. Chris Newman, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
binding-authority due-process lower-court precedent standard-of-review supreme-court |
Can a lower Court Use a different Standard other than the precedent Setting Standards from this Court? |
| 23-678 |
Pedro Pierluisi, Governor of Puerto Rico, et al. v. Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico |
First Circuit |
Denied |
|
bankruptcy-code close-nexus-test fiscal-plan oversight-board policy-dispute promesa related-to-jurisdiction subject-matter-jurisdiction title-iii Title-III-court |
Under-PROMESA-Section-306(a)(2)-subject-matter-jurisdiction |
| 23-6800 |
Jorge Espinosa v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
clear-cut-and-dispositive constitutional-right criminal-defense due-process error-and-prejudice ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-error prejudice-analysis single-error Strickland strickland-standard |
Whether all ineffective assistance of counsel claims are assessed under the Strickland error-and-prejudice rule, or whether such claims based on a sin… |
| 23-6821 |
Enrique Zacarias Diaz v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim |
| 23-6853 |
William Marcellus Campbell v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review merits-determination procedural-denial standard-of-review |
Whether a court of appeals must state the basis for denying a certificate of appealability |
| 23-6856 |
Stephen Aguiar v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights conflict-of-interest due-process fraud-on-court government-fraud habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance rule-60b sixth-amendment |
Whether the Second Circuit wrongly denied a COA |
| 23-6857 |
Lamar Gibson v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance lower-courts post-conviction-relief statutory-violation trial-testimony |
Whether the petitioner's due process, fair trial, and 6th amendment rights were violated when the lower courts omitted, manipulated, and altered trial… |
| 23-6862 |
Yasser AbdelHaq v. Donnie Ames, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights due-process exhaustion exhaustion-of-remedies federal-courts jackson-v-virginia judicial-review state-courts substantive-review |
Whether the Petitioner's Federal Constitutional Right to Due Process of Law Was Violated When His Jackson v. Virginia Claim Was Not Substantively Revi… |
| 23-6866 |
Cesar Abreu v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility federal-rule-of-evidence-404b federal-rules-of-evidence fifth-amendment narcotics narcotics-distribution prior-conviction prior-convictions search-and-seizure |
Whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, affirming Petitioner's conviction of narcotics distribution in the … |
| 23-6868 |
David Wayne Nelson v. Jim Salmonsen, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability due-process equal-protection evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus judicial-procedure prosecutorial-misconduct |
Did the U.S. court of appeals err in its rulings on the petitioner's habeas corpus petition? |
| 23-6869 |
Corey Jarren Forbito v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment certiorari-petition circuit-split civil-rights constitutional constitutional-challenge due-process firearms gun-rights second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment? |
| 23-6876 |
Joseph Neil Bronson, Jr. v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law criminal-attempt criminal-procedure due-process first-amendment free-speech legislative-intent overbroad post-conviction-relief standing statutory-interpretation vagueness |
Is IP U.S.C. §1994 unconstitutionally vague or overbroad as applied in Bronson's Metaphysical attempt? |
| 23-6878 |
Jose Luis Avalos-Sanchez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
Almendarez-Torres court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review jury-trial legal-precedent sentencing Sixth-Amendment supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-6880 |
Jamel Tyree Lunsford v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing takings |
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims |
| 23-6881 |
Miguel Salinas, Jr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment commerce-clause constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-statute federal-jurisdiction firearm-possession firearms interstate-travel second-amendment standing |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022) |
| 23-6882 |
Steven Brown v. Felicia Adkins, Warden, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process equal-protection federalism marriage same-sex |
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause requires states to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states |
| 23-784 |
Kenneth James Rosellini v. New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics |
New Jersey |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech legal-ethics res-judicata |
Can an attorney be sanctioned for failure to obey tribunal rules when asserting unconstitutionality under the First and Fourteenth Amendments? |
| 23-793 |
Isidro Javier Armenta v. California |
California |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment 5th-amendment 6th-amendment automated-enforcement automated-traffic-enforcement confrontation-clause due-process equal-protection fourth-amendment sixth-amendment |
Whether the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause holding in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts extends to automated traffic enforcement system schemes |
| 23-798 |
EEE Minerals, LLC, et al. v. North Dakota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-rights common-law constitutional-rights due-process eighth-circuit just-compensation property-taking sovereign-immunity takings |
Whether sovereign immunity bars a claim asserting the constitutional right to just compensation for a taking of property by a state? |
| 23-822 |
Nicholas Sandmann v. New York Times Company, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
fact-vs-opinion first-amendment free-speech milkovich-standard milkovich-v-lorain opinion opinion-doctrine sensory-impressions sixth-circuit |
Do statements conveying observed sensory impressions in factual, descriptive terms constitute protected 'opinion' under the First Amendment? |
| 23-829 |
City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, et al. v. Deer Creek Water Corporation |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
1926(b) 82-o.s.-1324.35 civil-procedure federal-obligations oklahoma-law private-corporation standing state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation waiver |
Whether a private corporation may waive State sovereignty without the permission of the State |
| 23-850 |
Lucinda Jones v. David W. McKeague, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights declaratory-judgment-act due-process due-process-claim federal-statute judicial-review jurisdiction non-merit-claim standing |
Does the Declaratory Act of 28 U.S.C. § 2201 afford jurisdiction over non-merit claims for due-process-violations? |
| 23-857 |
Owolabi M. Salis v. Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department |
New York |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-misconduct judicial-procedure new-york-court-of-appeals referee referee-report |
Whether the New York Court of Appeals can adopt a Referee report that was clearly based on violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amend… |
| 23-875 |
Estate of Arlene Townsend, et al. v. Steven M. Berman, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
11-usc-327 bankruptcy-code bankruptcy-disclosure bankruptcy-estate bankruptcy-professionals bankruptcy-trustee burden-shifting court-discretion fed-r-bankr-p-2014 professional-conflicts trustee-obligations |
Can bankruptcy courts effectively shift the burden as to 11 U.S.C. § 327 employment, absolving bankruptcy professionals from the burden of complete di… |
| 23-882 |
David Emick v. Colorado, et al. |
Colorado |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights conservation-easement constructive-trust due-process takings tax-credits |
Did the Colorado Supreme Court err declining to review and rectify the decisions of the lower courts that ignored the very important equitable princip… |
| 23-896 |
Sean Garnand, et al. v. Greg Moore, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights due-process interlocutory-appeal jurisdiction jurisdictional-limitation legal-question qualified-immunity |
Can a Circuit Court of Appeals avoid deciding purely legal qualified immunity questions over which it has interlocutory appellate jurisdiction? |
| 23-898 |
Ryan Thornton v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
Denied |
Response Waived |
burden-of-proof counsel criminal-procedure defendant due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-harm sixth-amendment |
When a defendant is harmed from Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, what is the appropriate burden of proof needed to correct this harm? |
| 23-908 |
Woojin Cho v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-error due-process harmless-error prosecutorial-misconduct reasonable-possibility standard-of-review trial-procedure witness-credibility |
Whether it is constitutional error for a prosecutor in summation to express her personal belief that the defendant lied on the stand? |
| 23-948 |
Texas Aromatics, L.P., et al. v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, L.L.C. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
absurd-consequences administrative-claim environmental-regulation federal-jurisdiction hazardous-substance maritime-law mixed-spill oil-pollution-act statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Oil Pollution Act, 33 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., applies to a spill that is 91% oil and 9% a 'hazardous substance' |
| 23M67 |
Christopher Hadsell v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|