No. 23-6653

Mark Marvin v. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2024-02-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure first-amendment free-speech habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance mandamus standing
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner has standing to file a habeas and mandamus petition

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . . J, WHETHER PETITIONER HAS STANDING TO FILE A HABEAS , AND MANDAMUS PETITION WITH THE COURT OF APPEALS WHEN THE QUESTION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH AFFECTS HIM AS a AMATTEROFLAW? ne Il, WHETHER, FOLLOWING MILLER’S ARREST AT A PROTEST AT THE USS. CAPITOL, THE COURT SHOULD HAVE CHARGED THE . ; JURY WITH THE ELEMENTS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, AND WHETHER THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS APPLY TO A PROTEST AT THE CAPITOL? , : Il, WHETHER COUNSEL WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO RAISE A FIRST AMENDMENT DEFENSE FOR DEFENDANT WHO WAS ARRESTED FOR CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT? ’ ii-a

Docket Entries

2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2024)

Attorneys

Mark Marvin
Mark Marvin — Petitioner
Mark Marvin — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent