Whether the petitioner's due process, fair trial, and 6th amendment rights were violated when the lower courts omitted, manipulated, and altered trial testimony that was substantial and significant

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . DMA court Tee oclers Noleke pebrtionec's due PROERSS Fair Aral and st mend cf Unis when tirwy vidlated Asuse, : 783 Cb), by Omitting \ manipulating and altetin trial | . testimony) Prok was Sulostonttal avd stant ‘cant as decloced in at dani Sub wyitked ty Support awk did Yo lower courts | WN hen Rey cho! lover dil 9 oikto °° “WME Ca, Parks Lak yoas WAISS| ee mince | 2) Whelver APP Ake Counsel Ine Mock ye Foc Bail ie wy ok tes : oe etlureto challenge | as instal eas thot “1M Vidletion of 27 USC. 753 Ch), ae?) eee x al counsel ineReetive foc failing to dbseah 4, wey Sele LOW ' violad OF FR, Ce} iP, . Fesulking in bis jery ont eee teil Pe 34 (by and 43@), 4.) Whether " . 4 | Tailed ko ony wrt “ormmmilved vey Prsible error when Ht ! a\t du ‘ ‘ Pedleghe Takin © Process Claims Submitted fy Con Speeiticgl| AW Are bo Dts caree, OMender deciornh ' SONY be ™E Vb Vecaled Senkene Sm ignahion thak wy Pending dep) ®O bebore Yaak ene ae iy OMether dase While PriL tone erdawkia US. VG We wos In Hg Same posture as 4 decided Sey, “2 gory Weleh Wali pr? (€ 9 the STAN pen CACCH, ooh § se Be time this court TN FL C-i8-3094 8 voabe) “ee Srendon Dupre ith sg Foc peng Peralkies wile ICI) and Q((Q) are 4 COstt Comes ed eu ooh ginler Leth and Hf nek Shether awe