Owolabi M. Salis v. Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department
DueProcess FifthAmendment FirstAmendment Immigration
Whether the New York Court of Appeals can adopt a Referee report that was clearly based on violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the New York Court of Appeals can adopt a Referee report that was clearly based on violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution? 2. Whether knowing adoption of false testimony by the New York Court of Appeals in this case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, 3. Whether it amounts to violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution for the lower court to disbar an attorney at pleasure? 4, Whether prohibition on double jeopardy Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution extends to . civil sanctions which are applied in a manner . that is punitive in nature? 5. Whether retaliation against a publisher that published a truthful article that presents no danger to the community amounts to violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution 6. Whether the Fourth Amendment is violated where law enforcement intentionally or recklessly includes false information or misrepresentations in an affidavit for a search warrant in order to gain probable cause? 7. Whether the demand for an excessive bail constitutes cruel and inhuman treatment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the US Constitution? ii 8. Whether it is proper for the New York Court of Appeals to ignore the violation of Civil Rights of the Petitioner by certain officers of the Department of Homeland Security including inserting an Arabian terrorist record on the passport of the petitioner even though the Petitioner is not of Arabian origin? 9. Whether it amounts to violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution for the Petitioner to be refused from orally arguing his case before the presiding Justices? 10.Whether it amounts to violation of the due process clause to interfere with administration of justice‘and conduct bias and prejudice within the Judiciary? : 11. Whether there is a violation of the Jury Trust by the Referee in reexamining facts of a case and Attorney ethical rules which were previously examined by the Grand Jury and Trial Jury in a criminal prosecution? Or Whether Double Jeopardy clause prohibits the government from relitigating any issue that was necessarily decided by the jury's acquittal in a prior trial? 12. Whether the facts that have been tried by the jury in a criminal prosecution can be reexamined by another body who was a witness in the same criminal prosecution? 13. Whether the Attorney Grievance Committee of the First Department can force jurisdiction on itself to hear a complaint outside its jurisdiction despite protest by the Petitioner? 14.Whether the findings of the plotted against the United States by interpreting against one of the critical missions of the Department of Homeland Security, DHS, in advancing American prosperity and economic security long into the future including ensuring a prosperous Homeland and so on? 15.Whether there is substantial injustice and breach of due process clause of the US Constitution in this case where the Referee findings was deliberately based on wrongful : conclusions, reading of minds and when relevant facts are overlooked or misapprehended or the controlling laws are misapplied or disobeyed? iv ‘