Did the decision in Martinez v Ryan require claims to be raised beyond the initial collateral proceeding for exhaustion purposes in Tennessee and other states with similar collateral proceeding procedural framework?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did the decision in Martinez v Ryan 132 SCT 1309 require claims to be raised _ beyond the initial collateral proceeding for exhaustions purposes in Tennessee and other states with similar collateral proceeding procedural framework? If exhaustion is still required beyond the initial collateral proceeding, did the petitioner satisfy the “Exhaustion Rule” by submitting his claims to the Tennessee Criminal Court of Appeals by way of Motion to Rehear?