No. 23-6504
Tormu E. Prall v. Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
IFP
Tags: cause-and-prejudice constitutional-error denial-of-counsel due-process habeas-corpus inequitable judicial-review lower-federal-courts rule-60(b) rule-60b
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it a grievous wrong when the lower federal courts demonstrably misread and reshape a habeas-corpus-claim?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is it a grievous wrong when the lower federal courts demonstrably misread and reshape a habeas corpus claim? 2. Is it time for the U.S. Supreme Court to say what cause and prejudice is? 3. Did the denial of counsel at a critical stage actual prejudice that infect the entire trial with errors of constitutional dimensions? 4. Are the circumstances in Questions | to 3 above extraordinary to justify relief under Rule 60(b)? 5. Would it be inequitable if the decisions of the lower federal courts are allowed to stand? I
Docket Entries
2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2023-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 20, 2024)
2023-08-29
Application (23A180) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until October 23, 2023.
2023-08-16
Application (23A180) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 23, 2023 to October 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. (Justice Alito is recused.)