No. 22-6803

Mario C. Thomas v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-history criminal-history-points criminal-procedure federal-sentencing mandatory-minimum safety-valve sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-03-22 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 'and' in 18 U.S.C. §3553(f)(1) means 'and' or 'or'

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Section 3553(f) of Title 18, U.S. Code, is the “safety valve” which can allow a defendant to receive a sentence less than the statutory mandatory minimum in some circumstances. Section 3553(f)(1) creates a list of three disqualifying conditions: (A) having more than four points, (B) having a three-point offense, and (C) having a violent two-point offense. The question presented is whether the ‘and’ in 18 U.S.C. §3553(£)(1) means ‘and,’ so that a defendant satisfies the provision so long as he does not have (A) more than 4 criminal history points, (B) a 3-point offense, and(C) a 2-point offense, or whether the ‘and’ means ‘or,’ so that a defendant satisfies the provision so long as he does not have (A) more than 4 criminal history points, (B) a 3-point offense, or (C) a 2-point offense. This issue is currently before this Court in at least two petitions for writs of certiorari: Pulsifer v. United States, Case Number 22-340 and Palomares v. United States, Case Number 21-40247. Both of these petitions appear to have been fully briefed by the parties and distributed for a Court conference on February 17, 2023. The Court should hold this petition for writ of certiorari pending its determination whether to grant certiorari in Pulsifer and Palomares. il

Docket Entries

2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2023-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-04-19
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-03-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 19, 2023.
2023-03-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 20, 2023 to April 19, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 20, 2023)

Attorneys

Mario Thomas
Talmage Edward Newton IVNewton Barth, L.L.P., Petitioner
Talmage Edward Newton IVNewton Barth, L.L.P., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent