| 23-6583 |
Muhammad Khan v. SAP Labs, LLC |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
9th-circuit appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment judicial-review notice-of-appeal personal-property special-needs time-limitation unreasonable-searches-and-seizures warrantless-seizure |
Question not identified. |
| 22-275 |
Benjamin Braam, et al. v. Kevin A. Carr, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Corrections |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-09-23 |
Denied |
|
criminal-justice fourth-amendment gps-tracking lifetime-monitoring post-supervision sex-offender sex-offenders special-needs special-needs-doctrine totality-of-the-circumstances |
Wisconsin law requires persons convicted of certain sex offenses to wear GPS tracking devices for life even after they have completed post-confinement… |
| 20-7706 |
JaKara Vester v. Henlopen Landing Homeowners Association, Inc., et al. |
Delaware |
2021-04-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
autism disability-discrimination disparate-treatment fair-housing-act housing-discrimination housing-provider-liability pretext-discrimination reasonable-accommodation special-needs |
The Fair Housing Act ("FHA ") is a policy enacted by
Congress to provide, within constitutional limitations, for fair
housing throughout the United … |
| 18-1465 |
County of San Diego, California v. Mark Mann, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-24 |
Denied |
|
child-welfare due-process fourth-amendment medical-examination municipal-liability parental-consent parental-notice parental-rights shocks-the-conscience special-needs special-needs-doctrine substantive-due-process |
When children in the County of San Diego are temporarily removed from their parents' care based on suspicion that they have been abused or neglected, … |
| 18-9172 |
Wendy Darlene Pitts v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-05-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights conflicting-information disaster-assistance due-process fema jurisdiction plea-bargain privacy privacy-act special-needs standing |
1. Did Femd error in releasing funds without due process of the Privacy Act law on Femmd Form 009-0-3?
2. Did Femd error thinking Defendant's home wa… |