Whether the Second Circuit wrongly denied a COA

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. IF |WERE DONALD TRUMP WOULD THIS COURT GRANT REVIEW OF THIS CASE TO DECIDE WHETHER THE SECOND CIRCUIT WRONGLY DENIED A COA IN THIS CASE GIVEN THAT PETITIONER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REOPEN HABEAS PROCEEDING FOR FRAUD ON THE TRIAL COURT, THE APPEALS COURT, THE SUPREME COURT, AND THE HABEAS COURT IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) AND WHETHER THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW THAT THE GOVERNMENT'S FRAUD ON THE COURTS STEMMING FROM ITS ILLEGALITY TAINTED A SUBSTANTIAL PART OF THE GOVERNMENT'S CASE AGAINST THIS PETITIONER? 2. IF | WERE DONALD TRUMP WOULD THIS COURT GRANT REVIEW OF THIS CASE TO DECIDE WHETHER THE SECOND CIRCUIT WRONGLY DENIED A COA IN THIS CASE GIVEN THAT THE . PETITIONER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REOPEN HABEAS PROCEEDING TO CONSIDER PETITIONER'S 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255 PRO SE-ARTICULATED CLAIMS RAISED THAT THE . DISTRICT COURT EITHER AVOIDED OR DID NOT ADDRESS ON THEIR MERITS !S BEYOND THE SCOPE OF FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b)? : 3. IF | WERE DONALD TRUMP WOULD THIS COURT GRANT REIVEW OF THIS CASE TO DECIDE WHETHER THE SECOND CIRCUIT WRONGLY DENIED A COA IN THIS CASE GIVEN THAT REASONABLE : JURISTS COULD DEBATE THE COURT'S RULING BECAUSE THE PETITIONER SHOWED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE OF LAW AND FACT UNDER STRICKLAND V. WASHINGTON THAT HE WAS DENIED HIS RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL UNDER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT? 4. 1F |WERE DONALD TRUMP WOULD THIS COURT GRANT REVIEW OF MY CASE TO DECIDE WHETHER THE SECOND CIRCUIT WRONGLY DENIED A COA IN THIS CASE GIVEN THAT THE COURT IS REQUIRED TO REEVALUATE THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF TRIAL COUNSEL'S ERRORS COMBINED WITH BOTH THE NEW EVIDENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S FRAUD ON THE COURT AND THE PETITIONER HAVING EXPUNGED HIS PRIOR CONVICTIONS? 5. IF |WERE DONALD TRUMP WOULD THIS COURT GRANT REVIEW OF MY CASE TO DECIDE WHETHER THE SECOND CIRCUIT WRONGLY DENIED A COA IN THIS CASE GIVEN THAT THE PETITIONER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REOPEN HABEAS PROCEEDING TO CONSIDER THE MERITS OF HIS PRO SE-ARTICULATED 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255 CLAIM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST OF COUNSEL THAT THE DISTRICT COURT AVOIDED DECIDING OR INVESTIGATING AND WHETHER ITS FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE VIOLATED SECOND CIRCUIT BINDING AUTHORITY IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b)? Li