Carlos Velasquez v. Robert Baldock, et al.
Will the Supreme Court of the United States reject Political Fraud, fraud and false statements in official transactions, when expressed by political authorities as United States Judiciary?
Does New Trial timing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 ever pre-empt the Court of Appeals discovery of a timely Rule 60(d) case and cause for extraordinary relief, including fraud on the court? Is it a ruling incompatible with a general reading of the Federal Rules of Procedure for United States Courts which prohibits Discretionary review?
Does Judicial Immunity ever pre-empt or prevent rational discovery and reporting of fraud on the court, or criminal contempt? Civil contempt?
Does United States recognize a term, 'Judicial Malpractice'?
Do U.S. District Courts respect fraud on the court petitions on the Pre-Trial terms of Partial Summary Judgment?
How are United States District Courts expected to recognize and otherwise safeguard the civil rights of Plaintiffs with legitimate fraud on the court claims for relief from a judgment?
Case and Complainant are very critically concerned over a compounding and collateral fraud on the court circumstance; in suits at law and civil equity for relief from a Judgment for fraud on the court circumstance cit. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(1) and (3) against several members of U.S. Courts, if Judiciary compound and precipitate fraud on the court with new and comparable Criminal Contempts, will the whole matter be resolved on the same legal basis in the District Court as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d), fraud on the court?
Will the Supreme Court of the United States reject Political-Fraud,fraud-and-false-statements-in-official-transactions,when-expressed-by-political-authorities-as-United-States-Judiciary