No. 23-6288

Carlos Velasquez v. Robert Baldock, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights court-procedure fed-r-civ-p-59 fed-r-civ-p-60(d) fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court judicial-fraud judicial-immunity judicial-malpractice new-trial-timing rule-60
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-03-22 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Will the Supreme Court of the United States reject Political-Fraud,fraud-and-false-statements-in-official-transactions,when-expressed-by-political-authorities-as-United-States-Judiciary

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Will the Supreme Court of the United States reject Political Fraud, fraud and false statements in official transactions, when expressed by political authorities as United States Judiciary? I [ Does New Trial timing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 ever pre-empt the Court of Appeals 1 discovery of a timely Rule 60(d) case and cause for extraordinary relief, including i fraud on the court? Is it a ruling incompatible with a general reading of the Federal Rules of Procedure.for United States Courts which prohibits Discretionary review? Does Judicial Immunity ever pre-empt or prevent rational discovery and reporting of fraud on the court, or criminal contempt? Civil contempt? Does United States recognize a term, ‘Judicial Malpractice’? Do U.S. District Courts respect fraud on the court petitions on the Pre-Trial terms of Partial Summary Judgment? v How are United States District Courts expected to recognize and otherwise safeguard the civil rights of Plaintiffs with legitimate fraud on the court claims for relief from a judgment? : Case and Complainant are very critically concerned over a compounding and collateral fraud on the court circumstance; in suits at law and civil equity for relief from a Judgment for fraud on the court circumstance cit. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(1) and (3) against several members of U.S. Courts, if Judiciary compound and , precipitate fraud on the court with new and comparable Criminal Contempts, will , the whole matter be resolved on the same legal basis in the District Court as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d), fraud on the court? | | II. LIST OF ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS Hon. Mr. Robert Baldock (10th Cir.) — (Velasquez v. State of Utah, 2:20-cv-00255/CA 1020-4087) Hon. Mr. Dee Benson (dec.) cimbpnesentea | (Velasquez v. State of Utah, 2:20-cv-00255/CA10: 20-4087) Hon. Ms. Allison Eid (10th Cir.) Crest . | (Velasquez v.. State of Utah, 2:20-ev-00255/CA10: 20-4087) | Hon. Mr. Paul Kelly (10th Cir.) ‘a | (Velasquez v. State of Utah, | Hon. Mr. Dale Kimball i (Velasquez v. State of Utah, Hon. Ms. Carolyn McHugh (10th Cir.) | Unrepresented | (Velasquez v. State of Utah, i Hon. Ms. Nancy Moritz (10th Cir.) tharepresented (Velasquez v. State of Utah, lrepvecented | Hon. Mr. David Nuffer, (Velasquez v. State of Utah, vie e-arroueataie ses Unrepresented vii | . Hon. Mr. Paul Warner (ret.) (Velasquez v. State-of Utah, Unrepresented , i \ : vill A. JUDICIAL RESPONDENTS THIS PETITION Hon. Mr. Howard Nielson, District of Utah, Central Division (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., 2:22-cv-00133/CA10 22-4098) Hon. Mr. Jared Bennet, District of Utah, Central Division | (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., 2:22-ev-00133/ CA10 22-4098) : Hon. Mr. Timothy Tymkovich, Tenth Circuit (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., CA10 22-4098) Hon. Mr. Robert Bacharach, Tenth Circuit (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., CA10. 22-4098). Hon. Ms. Veronica Rossman, Tenth Circuit (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., CA10 22-4098) f t Il. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING APPENDED HERE 1 i | . i | IV. CASES OF RELEVANCE (U.S. Supr. Ct. R. 14(by(iii)) 1 Velasquez v. State of Utah, et al. | United States Supreme Court Case No. 19-6263, | 140 S. Ct. 615, 205 L. Ed. 2d 398 United States Court of Appeals Case No. 19-4041 United States District Court Case No. 2:18-cv-00728-DN | ! 2 , Velasquez v. State of Utah, by & Through Utah Legislature incl. the Utah OLRGC, The Utah Department of Human Services, Utah Division of Aging and Adult Services/APS and the Utah Office of Administrative Hearings United States Supreme Court Case No. 21-5652 United States Court of Appeals Case No. 20-4087 United States District Court Case No. 2:20-cv-00205-DB/DK Xl , . i | | i | xii V. PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS Personal and Corporate Disclosure The Appellant is a citizen of the United States of America but reasonably to greatly educated, is on leave from the University of Utah to pursue litigation, and subsequently is a Private Legal Process Server, self-employed, and does serve documents for cas

Docket Entries

2024-03-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-02-24
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent Baldock, Robert, et al. to respond filed.
2023-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2024)
2023-10-13
Application (23A331) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until December 7, 2023.
2023-10-06
Application (23A331) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 8, 2023 to December 7, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.

Attorneys

Baldock, Robert, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Carlos Velasquez
Carlos Velasquez — Petitioner