Carlos Velasquez v. Robert Baldock, et al.
AdministrativeLaw JusticiabilityDoctri
Will the Supreme Court of the United States reject Political-Fraud,fraud-and-false-statements-in-official-transactions,when-expressed-by-political-authorities-as-United-States-Judiciary
QUESTION PRESENTED Will the Supreme Court of the United States reject Political Fraud, fraud and false statements in official transactions, when expressed by political authorities as United States Judiciary? I [ Does New Trial timing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 ever pre-empt the Court of Appeals 1 discovery of a timely Rule 60(d) case and cause for extraordinary relief, including i fraud on the court? Is it a ruling incompatible with a general reading of the Federal Rules of Procedure.for United States Courts which prohibits Discretionary review? Does Judicial Immunity ever pre-empt or prevent rational discovery and reporting of fraud on the court, or criminal contempt? Civil contempt? Does United States recognize a term, ‘Judicial Malpractice’? Do U.S. District Courts respect fraud on the court petitions on the Pre-Trial terms of Partial Summary Judgment? v How are United States District Courts expected to recognize and otherwise safeguard the civil rights of Plaintiffs with legitimate fraud on the court claims for relief from a judgment? : Case and Complainant are very critically concerned over a compounding and collateral fraud on the court circumstance; in suits at law and civil equity for relief from a Judgment for fraud on the court circumstance cit. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(1) and (3) against several members of U.S. Courts, if Judiciary compound and , precipitate fraud on the court with new and comparable Criminal Contempts, will , the whole matter be resolved on the same legal basis in the District Court as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d), fraud on the court? | | II. LIST OF ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS Hon. Mr. Robert Baldock (10th Cir.) — (Velasquez v. State of Utah, 2:20-cv-00255/CA 1020-4087) Hon. Mr. Dee Benson (dec.) cimbpnesentea | (Velasquez v. State of Utah, 2:20-cv-00255/CA10: 20-4087) Hon. Ms. Allison Eid (10th Cir.) Crest . | (Velasquez v.. State of Utah, 2:20-ev-00255/CA10: 20-4087) | Hon. Mr. Paul Kelly (10th Cir.) ‘a | (Velasquez v. State of Utah, | Hon. Mr. Dale Kimball i (Velasquez v. State of Utah, Hon. Ms. Carolyn McHugh (10th Cir.) | Unrepresented | (Velasquez v. State of Utah, i Hon. Ms. Nancy Moritz (10th Cir.) tharepresented (Velasquez v. State of Utah, lrepvecented | Hon. Mr. David Nuffer, (Velasquez v. State of Utah, vie e-arroueataie ses Unrepresented vii | . Hon. Mr. Paul Warner (ret.) (Velasquez v. State-of Utah, Unrepresented , i \ : vill A. JUDICIAL RESPONDENTS THIS PETITION Hon. Mr. Howard Nielson, District of Utah, Central Division (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., 2:22-cv-00133/CA10 22-4098) Hon. Mr. Jared Bennet, District of Utah, Central Division | (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., 2:22-ev-00133/ CA10 22-4098) : Hon. Mr. Timothy Tymkovich, Tenth Circuit (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., CA10 22-4098) Hon. Mr. Robert Bacharach, Tenth Circuit (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., CA10. 22-4098). Hon. Ms. Veronica Rossman, Tenth Circuit (Velasquez v. Baldock et al., CA10 22-4098) f t Il. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING APPENDED HERE 1 i | . i | IV. CASES OF RELEVANCE (U.S. Supr. Ct. R. 14(by(iii)) 1 Velasquez v. State of Utah, et al. | United States Supreme Court Case No. 19-6263, | 140 S. Ct. 615, 205 L. Ed. 2d 398 United States Court of Appeals Case No. 19-4041 United States District Court Case No. 2:18-cv-00728-DN | ! 2 , Velasquez v. State of Utah, by & Through Utah Legislature incl. the Utah OLRGC, The Utah Department of Human Services, Utah Division of Aging and Adult Services/APS and the Utah Office of Administrative Hearings United States Supreme Court Case No. 21-5652 United States Court of Appeals Case No. 20-4087 United States District Court Case No. 2:20-cv-00205-DB/DK Xl , . i | | i | xii V. PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS Personal and Corporate Disclosure The Appellant is a citizen of the United States of America but reasonably to greatly educated, is on leave from the University of Utah to pursue litigation, and subsequently is a Private Legal Process Server, self-employed, and does serve documents for cas