Whether a procedural declaration that has never been construed for precedential effect can be considered a final judgment that triggers the one-year statute of limitations for filing a federal habeas petition

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . +4) fee Dele Court Larllt, permite 4p "1A wrrot « bPinion’, IGN Oring "Dah, Crpar st ands Li iling 4, "AW lear ? : Hedin genial, tie Fla te deA dil "Pes Cur Veuy MBirm® CA) my Apeod # Set 3-62 Lely Ly rseue any Omron, ven my Tatra Biel? bik deal Procerkd illudreations ot he Flea, Ib Jul. CY. aS.'s Furl omental Entor, . ‘a 1h) erber Deny ne. my mothe n by dotrecd(lege Sentence efPessly MS ~ Constrbing, Cromtnal Post Cony sof Di beadliec det “have ¢ Great eect on he Peer Peto mtihedan Oh Fuser“) cee Fh DAP 490% BYES en FL py Ch. Dewrallonany, Terediedvs.. Fla d* Ded y Bees Canin. en BCA Dee. Frnal Rape QR Rede wn enol ets ens PUI BGA coer oem feet fentdoes /lile hn Pepe Fe > da Poh biting pee vittece as eatery” appre to nw DLak, bear ne 3)) Does Q Vroceethunal Declorotts,," thot fe NH ( a 2 u | IVECH C. Neve been CSNOUurds Lor " Pee eeburl Deyn \ ot a WNd,.O6 . Ct ak TH an oy he ino. "Dh ‘s uv ol Qa motion on te meric | holpl a ee 4 we hy, Oy hb (ole ngs da he Rolecho., an 2 ie | Cor ecet Loot! hens here 7 He Tey d fre Seka Courts camber tw Met Lollew Coufl De ah tley tLemgelfle wreoke 2 Tm Pinented as 4 (bh) tre Limi hattans roa FL crim, Pp, R* 3BSo ; Criminal Posh Conv tchion wl hon te on Cet ache | Or Cpe L Sentenge © May not he lek ev Gon teed iC PleL more hen Dy 248 Kile, be Sulg net & Serta Resume Oued ..." When dhe wlse ment 2 Senteee doh nef Trolite™ : per | . | . | _ | | Bement a Pack Convichion Glmgs eb tA 3,800 " aphton be gored TM cot Sudtere AR BUCO cine Ler nesg ae a) a ARE BC UD meron to WA drewel Plee Waren. Gill Rhye y Parte ee nnn coe COME Pehtliang tole petebmac Peder OT envithan 2. asol) deadline hecauee all. ao Pchithrens thebangesd— Tee Relgnant 2t—— oe ~Seabenad, Dcablaise a there Tedeemerts a EER es Sa a | ei nnn eee ene eens eee