No. 23-6876

Joseph Neil Bronson, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-attempt criminal-procedure due-process first-amendment free-speech legislative-intent overbroad post-conviction-relief standing statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is IP U.S.C. §1994 unconstitutionally vague or overbroad as applied in Bronson's Metaphysical attempt?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : . Questions Fteseated I. Is IP US.C, $1994 aylatlem + do atten +) unconstifutionally vague or overbroad: oe P P y ees j Or, as opplied in Bronson's Metaphysical attempt to athempt ? LL. Should Bronsea's conviction be cocaled under his 32255 pest-coaviction attack; . Oc have been resolved differently because ifs Vogueness has debatable issues, IO. Should Bronson aot have been entitled te « lesser-included offense scheme ag the foundation of his guilty plea where intention was transferred . List of Pacties : . . Mi paclies ooppear in the caption of the case ; ii

Docket Entries

2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2024)

Attorneys

Joseph Neil Bronson
Joseph Neil Bronson Jr. — Petitioner
Joseph Neil Bronson Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent