No. 23-514
Kim Jackson v. Chris Dutra, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act constitutional-law due-process judicial-system qualified-immunity standing stare-decisis
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-03-22
Related Cases:
23-377
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should reverse or recalibrate the doctrine of qualified immunity
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court should reverse or recalibrate the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Docket Entries
2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-03-05
Reply of petitioner Kim Jackson filed. (Distributed)
2024-02-16
Brief of respondents Chris Dutra, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 16, 2024.
2024-01-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2024 to February 16, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 17, 2024.
2023-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 18, 2023 to January 17, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2023)
Attorneys
Chris Dutra, et al.
Jordan Tindle Smith — Pisanelli Bice PLLC, Respondent
Jordan Tindle Smith — Pisanelli Bice PLLC, Respondent
Kim Jackson
Paul Whitfield Hughes — McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Petitioner
Paul Whitfield Hughes — McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Petitioner