Christopher Lenard Blockson v. Ronald Oliver, Warden, et al.
Arbitration Securities
What is the proper course of action when a court ignores the record on appeal and engages in fraud on the court?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , . , What is Hee way forward when “qll “hie cout Ignore the vecorel on appeal pring ftiaud on Mae Court and Out ere, ra Gove(Nunend lon.dact ? | Undled Ye tales oF lbelal Constiutt/on, all that had fe do wes ,ecte Yar fatt and fur Wuage woul 4 hag lau what F all juggs fe “ee but ingfeed SEC , | fo Ley ne weSctasler S wu stnduey? Iease awe juae vA (easonins oR dh nalion as (fF apples 4 tet Cal Clos, . Listek Fatties [I Al porkies appro tn Hae ccgton on te cover page, All potters af tn the Caption case on th ca A pis do gm SO the cee . the bode Whose judgament is the subseet oF thb petition 4§ afollows» Ewristephel Lena Blolison | Applet , Ween , Gabrwetla NajarA } Vevada Depot parent OF tor techie ns) and The oF Fender Waseywrent ivisten Respondent . ReLatect Cased | BlooMson Vi: Secty Howell. Case nov: 4.2-16 10 ) Jot ne United! States Court oF appeals for Hhe aM Cire bk, Dudgment enterecl on dusest 31,2023. ORover Dens deckiticate oc Ap pealabllity. 2) RlocKson vV, abriella Hajar a jer al» Case no-' V'AIey -O0I3\GM -V CFs en Ht Umtedstetes Distict . tout Oistiet oF Nevada. Sucgment enteveol ov 2 osf2eaaere’ chenying petition fof wit oF tleheas Corpurs 3) Bloelon u. W illiain Hatehinss et ql., Case na nial ev-O073IGN-VCF fn the Utnted stetes Ostet Coult, Iistier OF Vievada. Sucguseat entveton 7/95/02 Orde that Hite was ne Mister lage of just ee (in Hee prosetuter snisteplescating Hire Gledtube beccursG duck not Cla” my ple wus not Yoluutary. 4) Blelion v. The Salt oF ea PepactuseatoF cottections and Serry Howell, wrartantose so. 91360-COA, <n phe State OF [evade tou oF ppt’ Sudgunent eatied ov 3h 402! Okde( ot AFimant? in dent oF yy potion fol Wit oF Habeas boipus: 5) BleKion v. he state oF Nevada. Case mo. 67. $0Con, a the State of Needa tart ok Appeals: Jadsuvent eutereolon Ausees } geez I. Ord of Ati ment? antl fewand fo ect Mee Sus meat oF Conv ittiov). 6 bisorr vVievade Uopastereay0 CnlittionS ond verry towel, v/atdlen. Case no... F bstLOA he Hote of Viwada Curt oF feels Dusen? enticed on Marth 36, rod'L, ORYER dhvssia offs) deny lng ynoHiont to ovittusn anil ‘ator at Ou MartouS GeV ae Conduttand retusel oF Tale Wies an Ustict Attorney's oFFite for claH lounly, telade. 7) Blekson y. Hhedace Vepatiment oF onteobin 5 ancl Selly Hourell arden. Case slo. A-aog101b0-u Tin the Distith lout For ClaK (oun HY, Iwwada. Entered ov Liyeege _ Lthy oF Upe shit C lourt in ohnial oF Habeas Cor pus Pettron. 8) State oF Nevada V, thi stipe,” Bh eter. lose no. (18-3365 a-1 tn Hae Oster laut OF Mgt Cawly, Viewed, Or ibey denyn Witen te overlain and vata? lonsehor for Out? faycou$ Goveinmectt lCondutt and kelusal 0 Juoe Ue Se al Oistiitt AtfaRnty SPACE tal Clat County /ievacle » Fidgwient entered ovr (0/o%/ An 2 q) State oF Ivada /. hustler hbihson. (Ase qo, b-18-330884-/ in the Oyster Court oF Cla Cunly nevada, Otober aheny nf Hypertree oF Attomnty avd Mottin fo Wedl/Fy eel Stata 2 Tudmnvent entered On éy/ 14/ Ao2|, io) Chis fefher Lena Behoon V. babirel la Moje etal, Cas fo.’ 14.Io 910. tu the iInited Sees Iusfrict’ Cutt, Distt oF Mttada. Enfereo on OF 23/20 Al. This. (5 an rae Chemytry my seeoncl (pu ts7Fo’ Coun se[: =e Intlucled ft pease if iS #10 (onger / Or, 1d, NMULAT Cop at the end oF Aypredl ce, Haak that he Fectelal Facleye too if Ou pupoely | Table oF Content S opinions Bla. 0... SurisMeHwond oe ee lonsh tu Honal and Setulery Iawsyans invaled., 3 Statement oF the (Ose 2-2-2 SF feas0n for brariiny The Wit. . , 32. Conus. on BB TNEx TO AWENITCES , Aypnll A? BheKon v. Powell waoken ; etal, Te 21640 fin tht qr birtuit taut oF / 5 denying Cel Hh CALC AF pypanlobi lly, Faduaecat Piveclon the 31,2023, Med ee