Did the Colorado Supreme Court err declining to review and rectify the decisions of the lower courts that ignored the very important equitable principle of constructive trust which provides for landowners to receive the due and owning just compensation for the property values that the State of Colorado took by accepting permanent conservation easements thru an ex post facto bait and switch scheme to fraudulently claw-back tax credits?

question presented is: Did the Colorado Supreme Court err declining to review and rectify the decisions of the lower courts that ignored the very important equitable principle of constructive trust which provides for landowners to receive the due and owning just compensation for the property values that the State of Colorado took by accepting permanent conservation easements thru an ex post facto bait and switch scheme to fraudulently claw-back tax credits?