No. 22-7709
Ashley Latreece Thackerson v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-history first-step-act safety-valve sentencing sentencing-relief statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals err by finding that Petitioner did not qualify for safety valve relief under the First Step Act 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals err by finding that Petitioner did not qualify for safety valve relief under the First Step Act 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)? The Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit has written an opinion that indicates that Petitioner would qualify for Safety Valve Relief under the new criminal history counting rules in the First Step Act. [US v Lopez, 998 F.3d 2021].
Docket Entries
2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2023-08-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-04
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-06-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 4, 2023.
2023-06-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2023 to August 4, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2023)