No. 22-668

Nachaiya Kama v. Memorial Hermann Health Systems, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process equal-protection federal-law legal-standard sexual-harassment standing workplace-discrimination
Key Terms:
ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-05-11 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should any law repugnant to the US Constitution prevail?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED oo 450——q@xc 1. Should any law repugnant to the US. Constitution (the Supreme law of this land) prevail? 2. Has this Court ever extended liability to individual members of management, including coworkers in a Federal sexual harassment case? 8. Does the Constitution support “Un-American” practices under the equal protection clause in the workplace? 4, Whether the lower courts erred in the opinions below and expressed conflicting views on this issue? 5. Whether the lower courts erred in applying the legal standard(s) that this court set as precedence to all of Kama’s claims? 6. Is it proper for retaliatory actions to be taken against anyone for speaking up when they see wrong or inequality or injustice? ijPage

Docket Entries

2023-05-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-04-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-10
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent Memorial Hermann Health Systems, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2023)

Attorneys

Memorial Hermann Health Systems, et al.
Kelley Colleen EdwardsLittler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
Kelley Colleen EdwardsLittler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
Nachaiya Kama
Nachaiya Kama — Petitioner
Nachaiya Kama — Petitioner