Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit depart Brady by artificially heightening the threshold for materiality based on Petitioner's pro-se-status, charges-convicted

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit depart Brady by artificially heightening the threshold for materiality based on Petitioner’s pro se status as well as the charges he was convicted of. 2. Did the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma improperly deny petitioners Rule 60(b) motion as being out-of-time when the court did not take into consideration that petitioner had filed a Rule 59 motion for reconsideration that tolls the time to file a Rule 60 motion. Then did the Appellate Court incorrectly deny me a COA based on a merit decision?