| 23-1253 |
McLaughlin Freight Services, Inc. v. ContiTech USA, Inc. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-05-31 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure claim-processing claim-processing-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judgment judgment-amendment nutraceutical-corp-v-lambert remittitur rule-59 sua-sponte time-limitation |
Can a district court disregard Rule 59's claim-processing rule by sua sponte remitting and amending a judgment more than nine months after Rule 59's t… |
| 23-596 |
Yoseph Yadessa Kenno v. Colorado Governor's Office of Information Technology, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-12-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split civil-procedure due-process judicial-discretion newly-discovered-evidence pro-se pro-se-litigation rule-59 rule-59-motion spoliation-of-evidence |
Whether the Lower Courts violated Supreme Court precedents governing pro se pleading |
| 23-111 |
United States, ex rel. Howard Beck v. St. Joseph Health System, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-08-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split civil-procedure federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure jurisdiction post-judgment-motion post-judgment-motions rule-59 timely-appeal |
Whether a court-created exception barring successive post-judgment motions can deprive a court of appeals of jurisdiction over an appeal that is timel… |
| 22-6687 |
Robert Dee Carter v. Deon Clayton, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-02-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appellate-review brady brady-materiality charges-convicted circuit-court due-process materiality pro-se-status rule-59 rule-60b |
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit depart Brady by artificially heightening the threshold for materiality based on Petitione… |