Whether Petitioner's invited invocation before the City Council was private speech or government speech

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioner’s invited invocation before the City Council, without any instructions or limitations, was private speech as the district court held, or did the Court of Appeals err by finding that the invocation was government speech. 2. Whether Petitioner’s rights under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise of Religion clause were violated and he was retaliated against when his invocation before the City Council was silenced by the presiding official due to political reasons. 3. Whether Petitioner’s rights under the First Amendment’s Free Speech clause were violated and he was retaliated against when his invocation before the City Council was silenced by the presiding official due to political reasons 4. Whether the City Council President Aaron L. Bowman was entitled to qualified immunity for silencing the Petitioner’s invocation to the City Council.