No. 22-7007
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights custody-determination due-process jdb-v-north-carolina law-enforcement-interrogation miranda-custody-rule miranda-rights reasonable-officer reasonable-person reasonable-person-standard translated-interrogation translation-context
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When law enforcement officers use a translator during an interrogation, does Miranda's custody rule consider the unique circumstances presented by the translation from the perspective of a hypothetical reasonable person in the position of the individual being questioned?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED When law enforcement officers use a translator during an interrogation, does Miranda’s custody rule consider the unique circumstances presented by the translation from the perspective of a hypothetical reasonable person in the position of the individual being questioned? i
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent Indiana to respond filed.
2023-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Axel Domingo Diego
Mark Kelly Leeman — Leeman Law Office, Petitioner
Mark Kelly Leeman — Leeman Law Office, Petitioner
Indiana
Thomas M. Fisher — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Thomas M. Fisher — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent