Should a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and 60(d)(3) motion be reviewed de novo without a certificate of appealability?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Point 1 Should a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and 60(d)(3) mixed motion initially be reviewed de novo, without requiring: a certificate of Appealability Point 2 —~Are ignorred 2255 issues "procedural rulings that preclude a merits determination." per, Gonzales v. Crosby. Point 3 ~ Were Petitioenr's 2255 Grounds 2,4, and 13 ever evaluated . on their merits. Point 4 Was it proper to treat a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(3) fraud on , the court issue, as a second or successive issue. Point 5 Did the district court error by treating Petitioner's ~~ ; statute of limitations fraud claim as procedurally barred. Point 6 Did the district court error by treating Petitioner's ex post facto sentencing argument as procedurally barred.