Did the court err in its rulings on the representation of the petitioner, the timeliness of the case, the erroneous removal of the petitioner, and the handling of the PS Form 50?

No question identified. : ) QUESTIONED PRESENTED HERE ARE THE QUESTION (S): : 1. Did the court err when stating Charles Scialla and William Simpson who : did not have to be attorneys to represent Petitioner? 2. Did the court err when stating Petitioner case is time barred when the Office of Personnel Management processed Petitioner PS Form 50 on January 9, 2014, less than two-year of filing this case on December 2, 2015? 3. The Office of Personnel Management stated on a document dated July 2, 2018 that “Our office has determined that your former agency _ erroneously removed you on. 10/28/2013, was.they correct? 4, ELM 651.77 States in part: “If the decision is to remove the employee, the _ individual remains on the rolls only if a timely appeal is filed”, Did the . court err in their decisions? , 5. Did the Defendant who was in receipt of Plaintiff P.S. form 50 processed date 01-09-2014, one with USPS dated stamped, one with Respondent Exhibit #1 page #1, of 1, and one with appearance of been reformed, that’s was received by Petitioner among the document’s defendant sent to Plaintiff intent to unnoticed? , i