No. 22-7045
John Leendert Oskam v. United States
Tags: actus-reus bank-robbery criminal-law criminal-statute intimidation mens-rea physical-force supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the element of 'intimidation' in the crime of federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 require the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Under the Court’s recent decisions in United States v. Taylor, 142 8. Ct. 2015 (2022), and Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021), does the element of “intimidation” in the crime of federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 require the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force? prefix
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 20, 2023)
Attorneys
John Leendert Oskam
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent