Did the Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections know that Petitioner was disabled and thereafter deny him a reasonable accommodation to a known disability—when said disability denied him the benefits of the services, programs, or activities under Title II of the Americans with Disability Act, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW On oo 1.) Did the Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections know that Petitioner was disabled ; and thereafter deny him a reasonable accommodation to a known disability—when said disability denied him the benefits of the services, programs, or activities under Title II of the : Americans with Disability Act, (hereafter, ADA) by not being able to eat in the chow hall, go . oo, _ to the library, and walk for exercise as other similarly situated prisoner’s, in violation of the , ; . Eight and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? 2.) Did ODRC prove that returning a mobility aid to a disabled prisoner would fundamentally ; alter the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations . "involved under 42 U.S.C. § 12201(f)? .