No. 22-7253
Ilse Ivon Solis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights detention-duration fourth-amendment law-enforcement motion-to-suppress reasonable-suspicion rodriguez-v-united-states scope-of-justification traffic-stop
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Privacy
CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the officer's inquiries unjustifiably prolong the traffic stop without reasonable suspicion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. IN LIGHT OF THIS COURT’S OPINION IN RODRIGUEZ V. UNITED STATES, 575 U.S. 348 (2015), DID THE OFFICER’S INQUIRIES UNJUSTIFIABLY PROLONG THE TRAFFIC STOP WITHOUT REASONABLE SUSPICION? Il. DID THE DISTRICT COURT REVERSIBLY ERR WHEN IT DENIED MS. SOLIS’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE DRUGS FOUND BY A POLICE OFFICER DURING AN IMPERMISSIBLY PROLONGED TRAFFIC STOP ? Il. DID THE TRAFFIC STOP BY LAW ENFORCEMENT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY EXCEED THE SCOPE OF ITS INITIAL JUSTIFICATION? ii
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-04-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 11, 2023)
Attorneys
Ilse Ivon Solis
Amy Ruth Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent