Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1. The USDC & USCA-9 denied Kulick's right to Due Process by NOT : Addressing Clauee "(5) Filing Of Magistrate Judge's, Report And Reommendations Before This Court Dismisses This case! For Any Reasons"? . 2. The Contract Is: Invalid since Kulick did NOT have an! Attorney at Law under the Rule of Law of the U.S. Constitution To Advise Whether or NOT this Contract valid or nor? : 3. Under the Rule of Las, the U.S. Consitution has been; violated by National Security which sets it aside until that cured because ; National Security trumps shen any part of this U.S. Constitution has been breached as to DUE Process & NOT having an Attorney at Lav for "Advise". This renders NO trust, faith or confidence in this —~ U.S. Constitution shen its get this "trumps" as a repult of National Security ain the Prevailing, factual circumstance(s) ’ = currently exist? . 4. Kulick is NOT equal to be mandated by any Rites of aby Court to be on the same level as an Attorney at Las, being in Pro Per Stattus, that' NOT fair. The U.S. Constitution assures that anyone fa be "equal" & treated to “fair", Which Kulick have been Denied by USDC & UsCA-9 by their determinations against Rulick® | 5. Opinion({s) decide one way or other what litiagte pr vaals, hovever . these “opinion(s) are WOT permanent-being subject to; change. Which whether or NOT exista,#ill or sill NOT have somekind: of re-considera~ tion in this case matter before this Court? | 6. See page 5, will this Court provide a federal decision that #ill protect seniors that join & live-in condominiums & other common-—interest developments from corrupt Board of Dtrs. & their legal vendors & their insurance reps., et al? i . . i