No. 22-7537

Jacqueline Anderson v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-115 criminal-liability federal-activities federal-officials ninth-circuit-interpretation private-contractors protective-security-officer statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are private contractors federal 'official[s]' for purposes of criminal liability under 18 U.S.C. § 115?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Section 1114 of Title 18 of the United States Code protects distinct groups of individuals from attempts to kill them “on account of” their role in federal activities: (1) “officer[s] or employee[s] of the United States” who are “engaged in .. . the performance of official duties,” and (2) “any person” who “assists” federal officers or employees in that performance (emphases added). The text of 18 U.S.C. § 115, in turn, expressly criminalizes threatening certain acts of violence against the “official[s]” who are covered by § 1114 (emphases added). Section 115 notably does not state that threatening “any person” assisting such official is also a crime. Petitioner Jacqueline Anderson threatened a Protective Security Officer (“PSO”)—a private guard contracted by the federal government to assist in protecting a local Social Security Office. It is undisputed that PSOs are not officers or employees of the United States. Nevertheless, a divided panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed Ms. Anderson’s conviction for violating § 115 by threatening a person who is not a federal official. The question presented is: Are private contractors federal “official[s]” for purposes of criminal liability under 18 U.S.C. § 115? (i)

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2023)
2023-03-29
Application (22A842) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 10, 2023.
2023-03-24
Application (22A842) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 6, 2023 to May 10, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Jacqueline Anderson
Robert N. HochmanSidley Austin, LLP, Petitioner
Robert N. HochmanSidley Austin, LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent