No. 22-7630

Daniel Nathaniel McCall v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-24
Status: GVR
Type: IFP
Relisted (3)IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act categorical-approach federal-drug-schedules federal-firearm-offense mandatory-minimum prior-state-drug-offense sentencing sentencing-enhancement serious-drug-offense
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-07-01 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 'serious drug offense' definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) incorporates the federal drug schedules in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense or the prior state drug offense

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. This Court has granted certiorari in Jackson v. United States, No. 22-6640, and Brown v. United States, No. 22-6389, and consolidated the cases. This petition presents the same questions presented, respectively, in Jackson and Brown: Whether the “serious drug offense” definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)(ii), incorporates the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense, or the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the prior state drug offense, and Which version of federal law should a sentencing court consult under ACCA’s categorical approach? See Petition for a Writ of Certiorari at i, Jackson v. United States, No. 22-6640, and Petition for a Writ of Certiorari at ii, Brown v. United States, No. 22-6389. ! 2. Whether a sentencing judge may rely on non-elemental facts to conclude that a defendant’s prior offenses were “committed on occasions different from one another” and impose the mandatory-minimum prison term under ACCA, § 924(e)(1), or whether such facts must be charged in an indictment and proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt? | This petition also presents the Solicitor General’s restatement of the questions: Whether the classification of a prior state conviction as a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(A)(ii), depends on the federal schedules in effect at the time of the defendant’s prior state crime, the time of the federal offense for which he is being sentenced, or the time of his federal sentencing. Brief for the United States at i, Jackson v. United States, No. 22-6640; see also Brief for the United States at i, Brown v. United States, No. 22-6389 (addressing “the federal schedules in effect at the time of a defendant’s federal sentencing”). i

Docket Entries

2024-08-05
Judgment Issued.
2024-07-02
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Erlinger</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2024-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-24
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-06-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 24, 2023.
2023-06-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 23, 2023 to July 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 23, 2023)

Attorneys

Daniel Nathaniel McCall
Lynn Palmer BaileyFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Lynn Palmer BaileyFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent