Arthur Taylor v. Landon Bird, Warden, et al.
Whether the petitioner's medical condition and denial of compassionate release violates their constitutional rights
No question identified. : CUBRRRUARLS BRESENTED Petitioner: . Tasktobe pelease Uvder the Casa Law of Prima facie Cage's aNd to beCompen sated For the aMount of Eleven Million aS L pRayFor Reli éf of this liFe threatening disease Stageir ChfoNic. Redal Failuré. But Tam willing £0 amended this accowts thaough ant Litigatton Lawyer. Why they deaial an ON going — Medical sttuationdiagnosed byan Physician. OF CalFornia PRISON System. Ty Fact State oF Califo kd/a Depart Ment af Corkection and Reha bilta+tion /iaison is Liable For MyCoNdit-: iON L ANDoN BiRD, Wakden at Dvr; ABT. ONCE again my Freedom avdlom pensation Two uldsay *'s Not the First time the Courts be fav) oR, act oF a bias Con duct, Racism, and lea ig iW FAVOR, ad hRibery Za Fact T caught them withthere Shoe on thew Rong Feet Mow they cai wot add other tomy case FoR aclass action $0 Since thiNas Look So Complex and what they don't Under Stand they can’t UN Tangle. oR help rnga Robber eSCape Whonis guilty of AComplicity ina Co RRupt officials iN fustice. NO Respect For a deadly disease lsd a human being Lik They Should have put up acaut 4 ue SiGN Toxre Water ‘Di yP 2 au ‘0 my tree do METER DONO DRINK, \ m Compen S ated« asx Prav For Reliak , .