| 24-809 |
Howard Goldey, Associate Warden, et al. v. Andrew Fields, III, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-01-30 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
bivens-action constitutional-damages eighth-amendment excessive-force federal-officers judicial-remedy |
Whether an implied cause of action exists for Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against federal officers and whether the Court should reconsider… |
| 22-7752 |
Arthur Taylor v. Landon Bird, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-09 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights compassionate-release constitutional-damages cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process medical-care medical-neglect prison-conditions prisoner-rights toxic-exposure |
Whether the petitioner's medical condition and denial of compassionate release violates their constitutional rights |
| 21-147 |
Erik Egbert v. Robert Boule |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-08-03 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (21)Relisted (2) |
bivens bivens-doctrine civil-rights constitutional-damages federal-officer-liability first-amendment first-amendment-retaliation fourth-amendment immigration immigration-enforcement reconsider-bivens |
Whether a Bivens cause of action exists for First Amendment retaliation |
| 20-593 |
Hallmark Care Services, Inc., et al. v. Superior Court of Washington, Spokane County, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-11-04 |
Denied |
|
citizen-redress civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-damages due-process ex-parte-order government-liability judicial-immunity standing |
Does the doctrine of judicial immunity extend beyond protecting the individual judges, personally, for their actions, to shielding the government, on … |
| 19-7036 |
Jeremy L. Dale v. Anthony Agresta, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-12-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-damages cruel-and-unusual-punishment deliberate-indifference due-process excessive-force federal-tort-claims habeas-corpus medical-care prisoner-rights qualified-immunity |
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment was violated by the defendants' alleged deliberate indifference to the plai… |