Whether Congress Lacked Congressional Authority Under The Commerce Clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. Whether Congress Lacked Congressional Authority Under The Commerce Clause fo Enact 1B USC 154 (O-Te Te Extent That The Statue Allows For Criminal Liability To AHach here There's No Nexus-Intent Between The Use Of Force OR Coercion And The Intent That A Person Engage In Commercial Sex Acts ? a. Wheth Ts Supetvicory Authority po Whethet This Coo ft Should {se Us Ae Ronn v.US. 4a $.c42379, To Tivalidate The Ninth Cir's Definition OF “knewing’In US.v Tedd 6a F.3d 329 (2010) And 4S Application = For the Fist Time on APPEAL ? Applied) 3. Whether The District Court And, The Ninth Cir Violated Pitires Constitutional Rights By Invoking # "Harmless Evor defense Tat Was Wot Keli Upon Gy The GOVERNMENT, Ok Affording Me Jerendant An Oppurtunity To eara On Uestion My: The Constructive Amendment OF The Indichnent Was "Harmless’? H. Whether This Court Should Use Its Supetvisory Authority To Address Me District Court And Ninth.Cir Refusal To Apply This Court’ Precedent Opinion Tn US. v. Aguilar 51s US,593 (1995) To Retrhoners Claims That Appellate-Counsel Was Ineffective For Failing To Raise An Aguilar Argument ? 5. Whether This Court Should Use TS Supervisory Authority To Address The District Court And The Ninth Cir Refusal To Apply This Courts Ofinion Tn Elonis v U.S, 136 5.C4.2001 (A015) Regarding The Reasonable. Fetson Standard definition OF “Intimidation” Tn , Whether The GOVERNMENTS Theor , | | iO sf QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (7) Whether The District Court And The Ninth Cireutt: Failure To Address Petitioners Claim In His a8 USC 455 Motion, That Appellate Counsels On Direct-Appea} Rendered Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel By fai liN9 To Raige The District Judge's Constructive Amendment OF The Superseding Indictment By Removing "Whoever Knowingly on poont t chonabl Vefbs) In I's Jury Instrctions O Ine uury Violated Petit} hy Fional Rohe ‘ etitioners Sth beh and (4ph Constity (8) Whether This Court Shoold Use Ts Supervisory Authority To Determine Lf the Certificate of ——— Aepealability (COA) Should Be ExPanded To Encompass Any OF The Claims Raised La The 2255 Motion That Makes A Substantial Showing of A Denial A Constitutional Riaht ? oe 7 ;