No. 22-7777

Saria Walker v. R. Castriotta, et al.

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2023-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bias rule-interpretation standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why is the Constitution ~~ Right To Due Process ' NOT being Upheld ?

Question Presented (from Petition)

Question(s) Presented : 1.) Why is the Constitution ~~ Right To Due Process “ NOT being Upheld ? 2.) Why is Rule 221(b) Not being Upheld in the South Carolina Court Of Appeals ? . 3.) Why was the issue concerning Conflict of interest and motion to Disqualify not enforced before Judgment Oct 3, 2022 2 4.) Why is Judicial Bias and misconduct being upheld ?. 5.) Why was the issue concerning the Conflict of interest of Greenville county clerk not being taken into consideration ? 6.) Why would South Carolina Court of Appeals Remitte a cases back to lower Courts ? , 7.) Why is the law being used as a weapon against me but Not a tool to protect me and my rights as it’s intended to do ?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-28
Waiver of right of respondent The Carlonia Center for Behavioral Health to respond filed.
2023-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Saria Walker
Saria Walker — Petitioner
Saria Walker — Petitioner
The Carlonia Center for Behavioral Health
Christopher R. McKeownRichardson Plowden Robinson, P.A., Respondent
Christopher R. McKeownRichardson Plowden Robinson, P.A., Respondent