rule-interpretation
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-1128 | Angelique Layton v. RBL Financial LLC, et al. | Colorado | 2025-05-02 | Denied | Response Waived | constitutional-rights contempt due-process governmental-immunity personal-jurisdiction rule-interpretation | 1.Does Colorado 's current expansive interpretation of C.R.C.P. Rule 107 violate constitutional rights of non-parties by interpreting the Rule to ap… |
| 22-7777 | Saria Walker v. R. Castriotta, et al. | South Carolina | 2023-06-13 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bias rule-interpretation standing | 1.) Why is the Constitution " Right To Due Process " NOT being Upheld ? 2.) Why is Rule 221(b) Not being Upheld in the South Carolina Court Of Appeal… |
| 20-7281 | Michael J. Wright v. Mario Cardenas, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2021-03-01 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-procedure civil-rights failure-to-state-a-claim federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-discretion motion-to-dismiss procedural-requirements rule-interpretation summary-judgment | The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit has entered a decision in conflict with relevant decisions of the United States Supreme Court.… |
| 19-1328 | Department of Justice v. House Committee on the Judiciary | District of Columbia | 2020-06-01 | Judgment Issued | Amici (1) | criminal-procedure federal-rules federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure grand-jury impeachment impeachment-trial judicial-proceeding legislative-body rule-6(e) rule-interpretation | Whether an impeachment trial before a legislative body is a "judicial proceeding" under Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(i) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. |
| 18-1456 | William Mauldin, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Pauline Gibson, Deceased v. Allstate Insurance Company, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2019-05-22 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-procedure consent-to-removal deception diversity-jurisdiction federal-courts federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction removal rule-interpretation standing subject-matter-jurisdiction | FIRST: Does Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3)1 require every federal court, including this Court, to "dismiss" this case because the federal co… |