No. 22-7864
Tommy Lee Hubbard, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circumstantial-evidence civil-rights controlled-substance controlled-substances due-process federal-courts hemp legal-interpretation marijuana marijuana-classification thc-threshold
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the federal courts rely exclusively upon circumstantial evidence to decide that a marijuana substance is illegal, when the circumstances surrounding use of illegal marijuana are identical to the circumstances surrounding use of legal marijuana?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented here is: Can the federal courts rely exclusively upon circumstantial evidence to decide that a marijuana substance is illegal, when the circumstances surrounding use of illegal marijuana are identical to the circumstances surrounding use of legal marijuana? ii
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Tommy Lee Hubbard, Jr.
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent