No. 22-7901
Samuel Howard v. Renee Baker, Warden
Tags: conflict-of-interest criminal-defense criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance judicial-inquiry legal-representation prejudice right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Sixth-Amendment-violation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Is the Sixth Amendment violated when a defendant is forced to accept representation by lawyers whose supervisor have a longstanding social and familial relationship with the victim and whose colleague openly wishes to see their client executed, despite timely requests for substitution by the attorneys and the defendant? PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI — Page i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-28
Waiver of right of respondent Renee Baker to respond filed.
2023-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2023)
2023-04-28
Application (22A947) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 21, 2023.
2023-04-26
Application (22A947) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 22, 2023 to July 21, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Renee Baker
Gerri L Hardcastle — Nevada Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Gerri L Hardcastle — Nevada Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Samuel Howard
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner