No. 22-918
Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services v. Trina Ray, et al.
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-role economic-reality fair-labor-standards-act federalism joint-employment overtime-wages social-services-program suffer-or-permit-to-work
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a county may be deemed a joint employer under the FLSA when it plays a mere administrative role in a State's social services program by legislative mandate and has no power to prevent the State's decision not to pay overtime wages.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a county may be deemed a joint employer under the FLSA when it plays a mere administrative role in a State's social services program by legislative mandate and has no power to prevent the State's decision not to pay overtime wages
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-19
Reply of petitioner Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-03
Brief of respondents Trina Ray, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-04-21
Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association and California State Association of Counties filed.
2023-04-03
Response Requested. (Due May 3, 2023)
2023-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent Trina Ray, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 21, 2023)
Attorneys
International Municipal Lawyers Association and California State Association of Counties
Derek Paul Cole — Cole Huber LLP, Amicus
Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services
Jennifer Mira Hashmall — Miller Barondess, LLP, Petitioner
Trina Ray, et al.
Matthew Carl Helland — Nichols Kaster LLP, Respondent