No. 23-1062
Mark Changizi, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
Tags: article-iii-standing civil-rights constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech government-censorship government-interference public-health-policy social-media social-media-censorship standing
Key Terms:
ERISA FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-07-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioners have Article III standing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Petitioners are three individual users of a socialmedia platform who allege that federal officials violated their First Amendment rights by inducing the platform to suspend and censor them for making posts that criticize the government’s public health policies. The question presented is: 1. Whether Petitioners have Article III standing.
Docket Entries
2024-07-02
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2024-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-04-29
Memorandum of respondents Department of Health and Human Services, et al. filed.
2024-04-29
Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Moral Law filed.
2024-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Dept. of H&HS, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Foundation for Moral Law
John Allen Eidsmoe — Foundation for Moral Law, Amicus
John Allen Eidsmoe — Foundation for Moral Law, Amicus
Mark Changizi, et al.
John Julian Vecchione — The New Civil Liberties Alliance, Petitioner
John Julian Vecchione — The New Civil Liberties Alliance, Petitioner