| 24A440 |
John Stockton, et al. v. Robert Ferguson, Attorney General of Washington, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-11-04 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-protection covid-19 first-amendment government-censorship physician-speech strict-scrutiny |
Whether the First Amendment protects physicians' public speech on COVID-19 from government investigation and potential disciplinary action under stric… |
| 24A368 |
Children's Health Defense v. Meta Platforms, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-10-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
content-moderation first-amendment free-speech government-censorship misinformation social-media-platforms |
Whether the First Amendment permits social media platforms to moderate content based on government-requested misinformation assessments without violat… |
| 23-1062 |
Mark Changizi, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-03-28 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
article-iii-standing civil-rights constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech government-censorship government-interference public-health-policy social-media social-media-censorship standing |
Whether Petitioners have Article III standing |
| 23-5821 |
Vanessa Sue Stafford v. Arizona |
Arizona |
2023-10-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights content-moderation due-process first-amendment free-speech government-censorship government-corruption legal-statements public-platform standing |
Whether Nextdoor has the right to take down legal statements about government corruption |
| 21-791 |
Timothy H. Edgar, et al. v. Avril D. Haines, Director of National Intelligence, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-11-29 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech government-censorship national-security prepublication-review prior-restraint public-debate speech-licensing |
Whether Snepp should be overruled because it applied mere 'reasonableness' scrutiny to an agency's prepublication review regime, and failed to require… |
| 18-1000 |
American Freedom Defense Initiative, et al. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2019-01-31 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech government-censorship government-speech public-forum speech-restriction transit-advertising transit-authority viewpoint-discrimination |
Is the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's advertising space a public forum for Petitioner's Support Free Speech' ads such that Responden… |