Should the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit have reversed the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for failure to exercise its broad equitable powers under Federal Civil Rule 60(b)(6) to remedy the tortious conduct of Respondent, Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati, that harmed Petitioner's lawsuit and to protect the important public interest in the maintenance of complete and accurate medical records harmed by Respondent's ongoing nonfeasance in relation to this duty

QUESTION PRESENTED Should the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit have reversed the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for failure to exercise its broad equitable powers under Federal Civil Rule 60(b)(6) to remedy the tortious conduct of Respondent, Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati, that harmed Petitioner's lawsuit and to protect the important public interest in the maintenance of complete and accurate medical records harmed by Respondent's ongoing nonfeasance in relation to this duty. i PARTIES 1. Petitioner, Jahmir C. Frank, was born at Respondent, Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio, on July 30, 1998. Mr. Frank suffers from periventricular leukomalacia (hereinafter "PVL") as a result of medical malpractice that occurred during his delivery at Respondent Hospital. 2. Respondent, Good Samaritan Hospital, is a private teaching and specificalty health care facility in Cincinnati, Ohio.