Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment despite disputed material facts

Questions Presented Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against someone because of: race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Title VII also makes it unlawful for an employer to fake negative action, or retaliate, against person because they complained about discrimination, whether formally or informally; filed a charge of discrimination with an agency like the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or participated as a | witness in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit. Section 42 USC 2000e et seg. The law prohibits discrimination based on sex, including sexual harassment, and covers employee, it protects individuals from unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. This case centers around false documents presented to the court as basis for summary judgment. The court allowed and granted summary judgment in error on all disputed material facts. e Whether if | didn't give consent for my case to be , conducted by the magistrate Judge Kelly Pate. Rule 73. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). A record must be made of consent 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(5). | asked for trial by jury, never consented to a magistrate conducting any proceedings, is grounds for vacating judgment. e Whether the District court errored in allowing summary judgment with all material facts being disputed, which | expressed in my objection to summary judgment is grounds for vacating summary judgment. Rule 56 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Grounds for vacating summary judgment. | e Whether granting motion to strike, dismiss and summary judgment is prohibited without oral argument is grounds for vacating summary judgment. Rule 78 e Whether it is grounds to vacate judgment for violating federal fraud law 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 (Oct. 11, 1996) knowingly and intentionally doing any of the following: falsifying, concealing, or covering up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or entry. e Whether 28 CFR § 76.15 ex parte communication initiated by the district magistrate judge with opposing party on multiple occasions and after becoming clearly biased and prejudice, grounds for vacating judgment. e Whether Judge Kelly Pate denying recusal after clear , and concise bias and prejudice after initiating ex parte communication was inappropriate and becoming impartial grounds for vacating summary judgment. (Doc 56). e Whether all my newly discovered evidence since trial; material; of such weight that it will produce a new result. If this Rule 60(b) (3) allows a court to grant relief and vacate summary judgment. e Whether me being thrust info pro se and not registered in the cm/ecf system and newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered until my petition for rehearing Rule 60(b) is grounds for vacating summary judgment. 60(b) (1), (2), and (3) i ; | e Whether new trial under Rule 59 is appropriate | « Whether Rule 59e may be granted if the moving party demonstrates any of the following: (1) the judgment was based upon a manifest error of law or fact. e Whether Court of Appeals errored in denying my petition for rehearing en banc against the great \ { weight of evidence under Rule 59(e). Motion for new ' j trial; altering or amending a judgment, and fraud upon the court. e Whether the appellee’s fraud upon the court is grounds for vacating summary judgment. . | e Whether an order for alleged inappropriate behavior and sanction was grounds for granting summary judgment and dismissing case with prejudice. See doc. 65 ‘ e Whether pro se not having access to the cm/ ecf system and timely court filings, defiencies in my filings and postal mail was not being delivered is reason for | vacating summary judgment. e Whether my Amendment VII constitutional rights were violated, my rights to trial by Jury. See doc. 1 the comp