No. 23-1156

Eun O. Kim, et al. v. Parcel K-Tudor Hall Farm, LLC

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-24
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process equal-protection judicial-discretion legal-representation motion-to-reopen procedural-fairness timeliness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Justice system (The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) granting the Motion to Reopen to one party after 8 years from the final judgment, and denying the Motion to Reopen the same case to another party after just 7 months be justifiable?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The questions presented are: 1. Whether the Justice system (The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) granting the Motion to Reopen to one party after 8 years from the final judgment, and denying the Motion to Reopen the same case to another party after just 7 months be justifiable? 2. Whether the discriminating treatment of the Justice System (The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) between a wealthy party with a legal team of huge law firm against a poor party without any legal counsel be justifiable? |

Docket Entries

2024-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent Parcel K - Tudor Hall Farm, LLC to respond filed.
2024-02-16

Attorneys

Eun Kim, et al.
Eun O. Kim — Petitioner
Parcel K - Tudor Hall Farm, LLC
Stephen A. MetzOffit Kurman, P.A., Respondent