No. 23-1235

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice v. Lawanna Tynes

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: circumstantial-evidence comparator-analysis convincing-mosaic employment-discrimination McDonnell-Douglas prima-facie-case title-vii
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the prima facie case and comparator analysis set forth in McDonnell-Douglas-Corp-v-Green-remains-the-correct-legal-test-in-proving-employment-discrimination-based-on-circumstantial-evidence

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the prima facie case and comparator analysis set forth in this Court’s decision in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) and its progeny remains the correct legal test in proving employment discrimination based on circumstantial evidence or may a court disregard McDonnell Douglas’ prima facie case and comparator standard and travel under the less-rigorous “convincing mosaic” theory to prove discrimination based on circumstantial evidence. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit No. 21-13245 Lawanna Tynes, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, Final Opinion: December 12, 2023 Rehearing Denial: February 21, 2024 U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida No. 18-CV-62891-WPD Lawanna Tynes, Plaintiff, v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, Defendant. Final Judgment: September 8, 2021

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 24, 2024)

Attorneys

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice
Carri S. LeiningerWilliams, Leininger and Cosby, P.A., Petitioner
Carri S. LeiningerWilliams, Leininger and Cosby, P.A., Petitioner