No. 23-1312

Interim Storage Partners, LLC v. Texas, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-06-14
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law agency-action hobbs-act jurisdictional-limitations nuclear-regulation nuclear-regulatory-commission spent-nuclear-fuel standing ultra-vires
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Related Cases: 23-1300 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's exercise of authority to issue a license to a private party to temporarily possess spent nuclear fuel at a location away from an operating nuclear power reactor was lawful under the applicable statutes

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s exercise of authority to issue a license to a private party to temporarily possess spent nuclear fuel at a location away from an operating nuclear power reactor was lawful under the applicable statutes (as the D.C. and Tenth Circuits have held) or not (as the Fifth Circuit, deliberately splitting from those other circuits, held in this case). 2. Whether, notwithstanding an allegation of “ultra vires” agency action, a person must take steps to become a “party” to an agency proceeding under the Hobbs Act, 28 U.S.C. 2344, in order to then subsequently challenge the agency action resulting from that proceeding in court (as the Second, Seventh, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have held), or whether an allegation of “ultra vires” agency action can override statutory limitations on jurisdiction (as the Fifth Circuit, deliberately splitting from those other circuits, held in this case).

Docket Entries

2025-07-21
Judgment Issued.
2025-02-14
Reply of United States submitted.
2025-01-21
Motion of Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd. for divided argument submitted.
2025-01-15
Brief of Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd. submitted.
2024-12-23
Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and available with the Clerk.
2024-11-27
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
2024-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-30
Reply of petitioner Interim Storage Partners, LLC filed. (Distributed)
2024-08-30
Reply of Interim Storage Partners, LLC submitted.
2024-08-21
Brief of Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd. in opposition submitted.
2024-08-21
Brief of Texas, Greg Abbott, and TCEQ in opposition submitted.
2024-07-12
Amicus brief of Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc. submitted.
2024-07-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 21, 2024, for all respondents.
2024-07-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 15, 2024 to August 21, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-07-02
Motion of Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd. for an extension of time submitted.
2024-06-12

Attorneys

Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd.
David C. FrederickKellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Respondent
David C. FrederickKellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Respondent
Interim Storage Partners, LLC
Arnold Bradley FaggMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Arnold Bradley FaggMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc.
Paul D. ClementClement & Murphy, PLLC, Amicus
Paul D. ClementClement & Murphy, PLLC, Amicus
State of Texas, Greg Abbott, and TCEQ
Aaron Lloyd NielsonOffice of the Texas Attorney General, Respondent
Texas, Greg Abbott, and TCEQ
Aaron Lloyd NielsonOffice of the Texas Attorney General, Respondent
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent